Sunday, April 21, 2019

Week 3: Robotics and Art

Going through the history of robotics, it is important to note the printing press that was brought to the West by Gutenberg in the 15th century. This is an interesting point that Dr. Vesna makes. From looking at the topic of this week, robotics and art, I would not have thought that we would discuss the printing press. However, the printing press was a major shift in the sciences, arts, religion, and the list goes on (Vesna). The ability to print books allowed greater access to literature for scientists and artists and paved the way to incorporate these areas in robotics. 
                                                       Sketch of a printing press, a vital 
                                                        advancement for both the arts and sciences

Another interesting point is that many of first creators of robotic machinery were artists. For example, Leonarda da Vinci created an automata, essentially a predecessor of cyborgs. This is also the case today. For instance, Mirjam Langemeijer and Fred Abels are two artists or creators who invented the Electric Circus. The entire show consists of robots able to carry out tricks as seen in a typical circus. These artists created amazing realistic robots to the point where people would not notice that it wasn’t an actual human or animal. Abels, in the video below, makes a point about being labeled an artist. He explains that he doesn’t define himself as an artist; people labeled him this way, but he embodies a diverse individual working in many different fields that are normally thought to be separate. 

                                          "The Puppeteer and the Inventor" by Mirjam Langemeijer 
                                            and Fred Abels

Walter Benjamin wrote about mechanical reproduction eliminating the originality that defines the original work of people such as Langemeijer and Abels. The aspect of an assembly line was monumental for industrialization but may have removed the artistic nuances from production. This belief by Benjamin may be becoming more and more of a reality as mass production dominates any technological advancement. We begin to no longer look at a car, for example, as a unique piece of art as Felipe Thomas did in his article “La Figaro.”

The movie, I Robot starring Will Smith, embodies the role of robots in modern society rapidly taking the place of humans. Most societies encourage technological advancements, but we should be mindful when robotics are used as a mere means to eliminate the artistic, original, and beautiful work that humans are capable of.
                                          I, Robot Trailer 
Sources: 

Benjamin, Walter. "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction." (1936)

Donalo9. “The Puppeteer and The Inventor / Www.electric-Circus.eu.” YouTube, YouTube, 27 May 2008, www.youtube.com/watch?v=szCgiNOx-LE.

“I, Robot.” IMDb, IMDb.com, 15 July 2004, www.imdb.com/title/tt0343818/.

Langemeijer , Mirjam, and Fred Abels. “Electric Circus Dresseur Der Automaten.” Electric Circus Dresseur Der Automaten, Electric-Circus.eu, www.electric-circus.eu/.

Vesna, Victoria. “Robotics pt1.” YouTube, YouTube, 15 Apr. 2012, www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRw9_v6w0ew.



2 comments:

  1. Hi Isaac,
    I definitely agree with your statement that we should be mindful of robotics and the possibility of the removal of unique and original work created by humans. I think that although robotics does have this possibility, it is also possible that the field of robotics can create a new type of originality, unique to their own field.
    Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like how you looked at both the positives and negatives of robotics on art. You talked about Langemeijer's and Abels's works being labelled as art even though they do not believe so. It shows the intersection of the two disciplines and how they can be applied to bring joy and fascination to others. However, as you mentioned, robotics can also be negative in terms of taking away the novelty of certain works of art through mass reproduction. While I do agree that there could be a loss in the uniqueness of a piece of work if it is copied over and over for distribution, I still believe that people's reactions to the work of art tend to stay consistent no matter how they got to see it. Therefore, the novelty of the piece in evoking an emotion is still there. So I believe that the robots aren't replacing the capabilities of humans. I see it as more that they are working in tandem to help spread the beautiful works of humans.

    ReplyDelete