Sunday, April 7, 2019

Week 1: Two Cultures


Prior to this week, I did not give much thought to the idea of two cultures mentioned by CP Snow. Literary intellectuals and scientists have been “increasingly split into two polar groups” where communication between both fields is minimal (Snow 4). This problem is further enhanced by the school system and is evident even in universities such as UCLA. I am a third year Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology major at UCLA. Because of lack of interaction between the sciences, humanities, and arts, I did not have much exposure to anything other than the natural and physical sciences. This summer, I will be applying to medical schools, and this week’s discussions of the two cultures allowed me to contemplate the role of art and humanities in medicine.
A Method of Dividing The Two Cultures 
in regards to the anatomy of brain. Largely Rejected. 
(Slide Player) 


At first glance, many pre-med students may ask “What do the arts have to do with medicine?” It has been embedded in our minds that the two fields are separate and non-overlapping. However, after some research, I realized that art is of the utmost importance. In a TED Talk, Jill Sonke, a director of the Center of Arts in Medicine at the University of Florida, directly explained that art and expression of one’s thoughts and emotions can serve as the best medicine. One patient suffering from Sickle Cell Anemia would dance with Sonke in the hospital and simply the act of dancing alleviated any pain. Doctors were able to wean the patient off of strong pain medications because dancing served as the ultimate pain killer.  

                                          Jill Sonke's Ted Talk: Why Medicine Needs Art

There is literally a North and South campus, and many students rarely visit the side of the campus that is outside of their field. I thought it was natural to have this divide in the school. However, the two cultures were naturally in a symbiotic relationship. They became unnaturally separated (Vesna 121). The third culture is very important now. John Brockman defines the third culture as contemporary scientists establishing communication between both fields. However, the essence of the third culture lies between the increasing use of the same methodologies in the humanities, arts, and sciences. 

Separation of the UCLA campus into North (humanities) and South (sciences). Image taken from UCLA biochemistry website (http://www.biochemistry.ucla.edu/Faculty/graphics/map1.jpeg)
                                                     

Sources: 

Armstrong, Conrad. “Art and Medicine. Do You Have Sense of Art?” SlidePlayer, 2016, slideplayer.com/slide/6306207/.


"John Brockman: Matchmaking with science and art." Interview by Duncan Graham-Rowe. Wired UK. N.p., 3 Feb. 2011. Web. 9 Apr. 2017.

Snow, C. P. “Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution.” Reading. 1959. New York: Cambridge UP, 1961. Print.

Talks, TEDx. “Why Medicine Needs Art | Jill Sonke | TEDxUF.” YouTube, YouTube, 22 Apr. 2015, www.youtube.com/watch?v=23mve5S90Ws.

Vesna, Victoria. "Toward a third culture: being in between." Leonardo 34.2 (2001): 121-125.




1 comment:

  1. Hey Isaac, I really enjoyed reading this blog. I can relate to your post as I am also pre-med and have mostly been involved in more scientific classes. I found the part you mentioned about arts overlapping with medicine. As I am a psychology major, I have come to realize there is a lot more to do with medicine than just the biological component. I have learned how certain art and expressive programs can help relieve pain and depressive symptoms in many people. Even learning to be more expressive, especially in artistic or creative ways can help improve long-term health such as cardiovascular symptoms, HIV+ symptoms, and general satisfaction with life. Hopefully soon a third culture involving both the humanities and sciences together will be emphasized in the future.

    ReplyDelete