Sunday, May 26, 2019

Unit 8: Nanotechnology


This week’s topic regarding nanotechnology introduced new subject areas of quantum physics and chemistry. Dr. Gimzewski’s introduction of nanotechnology was brilliant. He touched on Richard Feynman’s famous lecture “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom” (Gimzewski). In this lecture in 1959, Feynman states, “The principles of Physics, as far as I can see, do not speak against the possibility of maneuvering things atom by atom” (Feynman). This is applicable now with chemistry tools such as mass spectroscopy. In this this technique, a molecule is broken into smaller ions by bombarding it with electrons. The fragments are then able to be detected through a spectrometer. Such a commonly used tool used in research labs and even courses such as CHEM 14CL are a prime example of nanotechnology.
Mass Spec Chart showing the fragment ions 



                                                          Mass Spec Explained 

After hearing the lectures from Dr. Gimzewski, I began researching some of his laboratory work at UCLA. One project that his lab worked on involved cancer diagnosis through nanotechnology. Immunofluorescence (IF) of cancer tissue supported that cancer cells are “softer” than normal cells. This type of research is extremely significant and combines wide range of subject areas to attempt to diagnosis one of the deadliest diseases. This week, I was introduced to nanotechnology including its history and found myself investigating areas in my academic career where nanotechnology is prominent. Mass spectroscopy and advancing microscope technologies have allowed us to visualize individual cells, bacteria, etc.  As Dr. Gimzewski mentions, we are able to visualize at the nanometer scale. These tools have allowed for the creative minds such as in Dr. Gimzewski’s lab to work on answering important physiological questions.

IF of Cancer Cells 



Sources:

Feynman, Richard P. “There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom.” Phy.pku.edu, CaliforniaInstitute of Technology (Caltech), 1960, www.phy.pku.edu.cn/~qhcao/resources/class/QM/Feynman's-Talk.pdf.

Gimzewski, James. “Nanotech Jim pt1.” YouTube, YouTube, 21 May 2012, www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=704&v=q7jM6-iqzzE.

Gimzewski Lab. “Cancer Diagnosis by AFM.” Cancer Diagnosis by AFM | Gimzewski Lab, Gimzewski , gim.chem.ucla.edu/content/cancer-diagnosis-afm.

Harris, William. “How Mass Spectrometry Works.” HowStuffWorks Science, HowStuffWorks, 28 June 2018, science.howstuffworks.com/mass-spectrometry.htm.

Mendis, Lakshini. “Imaging Mass Spectrometry: The New(Ish) Kid on the Block.” Bitesize Bio, Bitesize Bio, 9 July 2016, bitesizebio.com/25770/imaging-mass-spectrometry-the-newish-kid-on-the-block/.

Saturday, May 25, 2019

Event 2: Science + Sound 2.0

Rattlesnake project 

On May 5, I attended two different presentations at the Science + Sound 2.0 program: Sarah Brady’s “Sound as Extruded Form” and Jocelyn Ho’s “Sheng-mobile phones as musical instruments.” In her talk, Brady incorporated her artwork containing aspects of technology to highlight the creation of sound. One of the most interesting pieces involved the interaction of viewers. It was a large electronic board that sensed the viewer’s hand motion and emitted different sounds based on that movement. Another one of her pieces was inspired by rattlesnakes. She mentions her fascination with the natural sound coming from the animal. In her rattle snake project, she was able to recreate that sound with an automated metal rod with a coiled head. I really enjoyed her talk because she described the process of an artist. She begins with stating her inspiration and follows with the technological and artistic work creating sound.

Video of electronic sound board by Sarah Brady. 


Sarah Brady Presenting 
















The second talk was one of the most unique talks I have ever attended. Jocelyn Ho, a pianist and artist, took a completely different approach to piano recitals and concerts. She wanted the audience to become the performers, a concept that I have never heard of. In the first half of the talk, she described the way she communicated with the audience. To show the changes in her body expression as she played the piano, she dressed herself in luminous coils that changed color based on her body motion. The second part of the talk was a performance, in which everyone in the audience became involved. She instructed us to use our phones and enter a specific site. The website divided the audience based on location (4 parts each a different color). The performance was very unique. The website contained different instructions for the different parts of the room. One instruction I received was “Tap when you swallow saliva.” When I tapped, my phone would make a unique sound. Each one in the room had an instruction and the collection of sounds was the performance. This was such an amazing display of originality and creativity. 


Selfie at the event 
The way the room was split on the Jocelyn Ho's website. 


Jocelyn Ho presenting 

Sunday, May 19, 2019

Unit 7: Neuroscience and Art


As usual, we begin each week with some historical context and background regarding each unit. In this week’s topic of neuroscience, Dr. Vesna started by doing the same. However, it was intriguing that most of the individuals covered were not artists. For instance, Franz Joseph Gall was a physician who believed that the human brain’s physical shape is an indication of character and mental abilities (Vesna). Of course, this method of thinking was debunked. Another individual that heavily influenced the field of neuroscience in his time is Santiago Ramon y Cajal. He was a Spanish pathologist, histologist, and neuroscientist. His work with microscopy helped reveal the structure of neurons. Starting us off by mentioning these two individuals was interesting. Dr. Vesna definitely emphasizes the connectivity of different fields, and this idea heavily influenced my blog this week.  

One prime example of the integration of various fields in neuroscience is developing here at UCLA. The UCLA Neurosurgery department created a robot that can check on patients and provide them with immediate attention from doctors who may be not at the hospital. Rather than taking the time to rush to the hospital, doctors can give their immediate input. This concept intrigued me as it united almost all the topics that we have covered so far: robotics, medicine, technology, neuroscience, and art. 
                                          Robo-doc at UCLA Ronald Reagan 

To relate these ideas to physical works of art, I investigated some of the works of Greg Dunn. He portrays neurons in such a natural manner, exhibiting similarities to trees, flowers, and animals. One of his artworks, Myelination, looks at the myelin that is on an axon. The work exhibits this myelination with characteristics of a tree trunk. Another key artistic inspiration, as mentioned by Dr. Vesna, is dreams. Because little is known about the process of dreaming, artists utilize the freedom to create abstract works or creative ideas that do not have to abide by the constraints of reality. One such artwork created in the 1800s is shown below.

                                                                                     
         Myelination By Greg Dunn                                         


                                          The Jockey's Dream by Currier and Ives

Sources:


Currier & Ives. “The Art of Dreams.” The Public Domain Review, Currier & Ives, 26 Apr. 2018, publicdomainreview.org/collections/the-art-of-dreams/.

Dunn, Greg. “Myelination.” GREG DUNN DESIGN, GREG DUNN DESIGN, www.gregadunn.com/gold-leaf-painting-by-greg-dunn/myelination/.

Dunn, Greg. “Myelination, Art by Greg Dunn.” YouTube, YouTube, 19 Oct. 2016, www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=15&v=I7j363a3R8k.

Health, UCLA. “Robo-Doc Navigates on Its Own | UCLA Neurosurgery.” YouTube, YouTube, 15 May 2013, www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=203&v=FlhBgH3dVF4.

Vesna, Victoria. “Neuroscience-pt1.Mov.” YouTube, YouTube, 17 May 2012, www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=482&v=TzXjNbKDkYI.

Sunday, May 12, 2019

Week 6: Biotech + Art

This week’s discussion regarding biotechnology with art really intrigued me. I work in a research lab at UCLA that incorporates biotechnology such as CRISPR. As Dr. Vesna mentioned, there has been a lot of debate regarding the defining factors of biotechnology used as art. This leads to ethical questions and controversies over matters such as animal experimentation and gene editing. I work with transgenic mice daily in the lab, and therefore, I witness some of the incredible technology that allows for controlled experimentation but that might also lead to certain questions about the ethics of such experiments.


                                          CRISPR explained Visually

 One of the most influential artists in the biotechnology field is Joe Davis. His ideas were often considered insane, but he pioneered the field of bio-art (Vesna). He allowed for audio microscopy where one can hear the response of different cells and their acoustic signature (Davis). He looked at genes and DNA in a different manner. They were his artistic medium. Davis would synthesize and insert DNA into bacteria, particularly E.Coli. His visions for these projects were fascinating; he wanted to embed a sign of human intelligence in these prokaryotes. After researching Davis’s work further, I found that he also began to genetically modify trees. He planned to take 50,000 of the most popular Wikipedia pages and embed them into a literal “tree of knowledge” (Beverley).

                                          Joe Davis plans to genetically modify apple trees.

 Another amazing, Nobel-prize worthy creation belongs to Craig Venter. He took genetic editing to a completely different level by attempting to create an organism from scratch. Venter used synthesizers to create small fragments of DNA and utilized bacteria to amplify and expand that DNA (Rosser). He successfully created the first synthesized bacterial cell. This cell has 531,000 base pairs and just 473 genes (Venter). The simple thought of attempting to create an entire genome leaves me in awe.

                                          Craig Venter's Ted Talk

Sources:


Davis, Joe. “Audio Microscope.” Audio Microscope: Joe Davis : Genetics and Culture, 2000, geneticsandculture.com/genetics_culture/pages_genetics_culture/gc_w03/davis_audio_scope.htm

Mitchell, Beverley. “Bio-Artist Joe Davis to Build a Genetically Modified 'Tree of Knowledge' With Wikipedia Pages.” Inhabitat Green Design Innovation Architecture Green Building, Inhabitat, 16 May 2014, inhabitat.com/tree-of-knowledge-bio-artist-joe-davis-to-insert-dna-encoded-version-of-wikipedia-into-apples/.

Rosser, Susan. “We've Learned to Read Our Genes. Now We Need to Start Writing Them | Susan Rosser.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 4 June 2016, www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/04/learned-to-read-genes-now-start-writing-them.

Venter, Craig. “TEDxCaltech - J. Craig Venter - Future Biology.” YouTube, YouTube, 16 Feb. 2011, www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdgfzdlgUHw.

Vesna, Victoria. “5 Bioart pt1 1280x720.” YouTube, YouTube, 18 Sept. 2013, www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=493&v=PaThVnA1kyg.